<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Bottleneck on WorldSense Tech Blog</title><link>https://worldsensetech.com/en/tags/bottleneck/</link><description>Recent content in Bottleneck on WorldSense Tech Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://worldsensetech.com/en/tags/bottleneck/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>World Models: 8 Years and the Same Bottleneck</title><link>https://worldsensetech.com/en/articles/world-model-8year-bottleneck/</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://worldsensetech.com/en/articles/world-model-8year-bottleneck/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;After working in the world models direction for over half a year, my biggest takeaway is this: there are plenty of papers, but very few that truly land in practice. Recently I read a 2026 survey from the Chinese Academy of Sciences and several universities that does an excellent job of mapping out eight years of progress. Drawing on my own hands-on experience, I want to discuss a few bottlenecks that still haven&amp;rsquo;t been fundamentally broken.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>